Ignacio Monzon vs Jose Joaquin Miranda Cisneros Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L W L W W L
Form
L L W W L W L L W LH2H: Monzon 1 - 0 Cisneros
They have played 2 sets in total, with Monzon winning 2 and Cisneros winning 0. The last match between Monzon and Cisneros was at the M15 Villena, 15-11-2020, Q1 round, Clay with Ignacio Monzon getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ignacio Monzon | 1 |
| Jose Joaquin Miranda Cisneros | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ignacio Monzon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Ignacio Monzon
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ignacio Monzon
Player
Igor Gimenez
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
19 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Monzon
Player
Gabriel Roveri Sidney
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vladyslav Orlov
Player
Ignacio Monzon
55%
(
58 of
105)
1st Serve %
63%
(
80 of
128)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
48 of
80)
51%
(
24 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
43 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
56 of
128)
118
Total Points Won
115
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Monzon
Player
Lautaro Agustin Falabella
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
79
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
Player
Ignacio Monzon
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Player
Ignacio Monzon
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Monzon
Player
Lautaro Agustin Falabella
62%
(
68 of
110)
1st Serve %
45%
(
43 of
95)
1
Aces
4
15
Double Faults
7
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
45 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
109
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Ignacio Monzon
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victor Lilov
Player
Ignacio Monzon
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
80%
(
48 of
60)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Jose Joaquin Miranda Cisneros Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Jose Joaquin Miranda Cisneros
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Joaquin Miranda Cisneros
Player
Jose-Manuel Goicoetxea-Fuster
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
39%
(
29 of
74)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Jose Joaquin Miranda Cisneros
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 4-6 12-10 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (257/230) | Win/Loss | 46% (36/43) |
| 53% (593/529) | Sets Win/Loss | 46% (80/94) |
| 51% (5201/4974) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (805/835) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 210 | Aces Total | 6 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 1094 | Total Double Faults | 51 |
| 1:29:49 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 392.08 | Average Opponent Rank | 235.43 |
| 70% (17740/25388) | 1st Serve % | 60% (544/910) |
| 59% (10451/17740) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (303/544) |
| 45% (3425/7657) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (150/366) |
| 48% (1439/2987) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (38/87) |
| 44% (11024/24927) | Return Points Win % | 39% (347/893) |
| 52% (254/484) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (36/78) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (42/91) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 46% (69/151) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (9/17) |
| 84% (265/222) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (33/30) |
| 16% (265/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (33/3) |
| 15% (222/34) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (46/6) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
